How has Dan Helmer contributed to veterans’ troubles in Virginia?
He will also support elevated transportation funding and infrastructure improvements by starting a Public Private Partnership and seeking local cooperation. How will you want to address our failing roads and infrastructure? If elected to the state Senate, he is going to work to expand transportation funding by way of a a highway user fee and increased fuel tax revenue. – In reaction to Republican initiatives to defund infrastructure spending, Dan safely and effectively sponsored legislation to stop the Transportation Trust Fund from being raided in the next spending budget.
He helped pass a transportation bill that invested 3 billion to improve roads, bridges, and highways throughout the Commonwealth. In days gone by, Helmer in addition has championed legislation to reduce congestion on Virginia’s highways, raise the number of public transit options, and also improve pedestrian safety on Virginia roads. As chair of the Senate Committee on Transportation, Helmer has been an advocate for boosting the state of Virginia’s highways and bridges.
The bill likewise increased funding for repairs for the state’s bridges and made it simpler for state agencies to invest in environmentally friendly equipment. In January 2024, Dan introduced the bipartisan Extreme Risk Firearms Protection Act to assist Virginia families keep guns out of the hands of loved ones exhibiting troubling behaviors or https://www.facebook.com/HelmerVA/ mental health issues. This bill will create a severe danger firearms protection order that enables police to temporarily confiscate weapons from individuals who exhibit troubling behavior.
It’s time for Republicans in Richmond to put aside partisanship and join me in supporting steps to broaden Medicaid.” Will you vote to expand Medicaid in Virginia? Dan says, “We must cease playing politics with healthcare. – Dan has consistently supported expanding Medicaid to more Virginians who need it and also voted against measures to limit use of healthcare. The federal government would be reimbursed by the insurance provider, then we’d reimburse them for that percentage.
What we’d be doing is changing exactly how we spend on healthcare. We’d cut down how much we pay the insurance company on the back end, so we may have significantly less of a reliance on income taxes and also more reliance on sales taxes. It is a different version for just how we spend on it. We wouldn’t be having taxes increased due to that. It is not about raising taxes for the objective of filling the budget of yours. It’s changing how we pay for it.
So, the more sick and also older folk men and women you have, the more likely the patient will die or even suffer serious harm when healing has to be withheld.